April 13

UK Will Be More Skeptical of Chinese Investment After Steel Rescue

0  comments

ENB Pub Note: In the related story, Millions on coal from Japan to save our steel: Net zero ‘madness’ as taxpayers foot the bill to keep furnaces burning,

When making energy and finance decisions, two critical things eventually surface. First, physics matters, and fiscal responsibility will always win. In this case, the UK leaders have failed in their environmental and budgetary obligations. Just for fun, in the above article, I asked Grok on X to calculate the CO2 output in tons for the shipment. And the answer was over 6,938 metric tons of CO2. For a government that is making horrible financial and energy-related decisions, this is funny and sad, and you can feel sorry for the average legal UK citizen who voted for the other party. 


The UK government will take a more skeptical approach to future Chinese investment in sensitive sectors of the economy after it was forced to rescue the country’s last primary steel manufacturer, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said Sunday.

Asked on Sky News whether the move to take control of Jingye Group’s British Steel has resulted in a “high trust bar” for UK-Chinese co-operation, Reynolds agreed, saying: “We’ve got to recognize that.”

Jonathan Reynolds speaks to members of the media, on April 12.Photographer: Benjamin Cremel/AFP/Getty Images

Parliament passed an emergency bill Saturday to take control of the steelmaker, after talks with its Chinese owner broke down. Reynolds said Jingye had been seeking more than double the £500 million ($654 million) offered by the government to sustain the operation, and planned to close the unprofitable furnaces and import steel from China instead.

A full nationalization of British Steel is still “the likely option,” Reynolds said, though the government would still prefer to find a partner for the business. But that partner is unlikely to be Chinese.

Energy News Beat 


Tags


You may also like