ENB Pub Note: This article from Keith Johnson at Foreign Policy has some interesting and valid points. That said, I believe that the price of oil will be low for a short period of time. The markets are overreacting, and I believe we are seeing a reset in the oil and gas market to go back to some sort of fundamentals. Actual supply and demand may become more important again. We have seen too much data manipulation and whipsawing from data correction numbers in the past. Look at Saudi Arabia and its budget needs. They are in the 80 to 85 dollar range, and they need steady oil prices, but they are trying to herd children who are their OPEC+ members. When the United States, the UK, or the EU need extra money, they print it. When the OPEC+ members need extra money, they drill more outside their production quotas. That, coupled with the fact that Biden-era sanctions have driven Russia’s business to China, Asia, and India and President Putin needs oil to fund his war, Putin would be better off if China and India’s economies do well. He only needs China’s demand to remain flat and India on its growth path for him to hit his budgets.
For President Trump, he is pursuing the “Right Sizing” of trade for the United States and is on the right path. That said, he needs some more help from his group working on ending the Russian / Ukraine war, as it is apparent they do not understand President Putin’s motivations.
The new duties have brought down oil prices, but cheap oil is bad for the United States these days.
By Keith Johnson, a reporter at Foreign Policy covering geoeconomics and energy.
U.S. President Donald Trump promised to bring down energy prices, and on that front at least, he has delivered.
Thanks to his trade war, crude oil prices have plunged. Benchmark prices in New York and London are down about 15 percent in the last few days, a drop that is matched only by the declines on Wall Street, in Asian stock markets, and in Tesla’s appeal. Crude oil went from the mid $70s a barrel when Trump was elected the second time to the upper $50s (briefly) on Monday.
The good news, such as it is, is that cheaper oil is a win, as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gleefully said. Cheaper oil means cheaper gasoline. The bad news is that there may not be jobs to drive to.
Global markets have not responded kindly to Trump’s war on trade, and serious economists (and even investment bankers) worry about a recession. It might get worse: On Monday, Trump threatened China with additional 50 percent tariffs on top of the 34 percent tariff imposed last week, which itself came atop the 20 percent tariffs previously levied, in addition to all other tariffs, which are also still in effect.
Cheap oil is, in a reversal from decades past, bad news for the United States—and especially for some deeply Republican parts of the country, which have in the past decade and a half revolutionized the oil business and made the United States the greatest producer of oil and natural gas in the history of the world. The United States pumped about 13.2 million barrels of oil a day on average last year; Saudi Arabia isn’t even in the double digits at the moment.
The problem dates from last week, when Trump launched a trade war against every country on earth, which has led the world to worry about rising prices and slowing growth. Recessions mean less demand for oil, which is why West Texas and Brent crude have spent the last few days in the red, and are still looking sickly.
That would have been bad enough for the oil patch. But Trump also put tariffs on steel imports. It just so happens that the United States imports many of the pipes, tubes, and casings that are used in the oil and gas industry. So higher costs for production, coupled with a lower price for the product, are suboptimal, despite the Trump administration’s vows to turbocharge the U.S. energy business.
“Deglobalization creates headwinds for energy dominance,” said Kevin Book, the founder of ClearView Energy Partners, an energy consultancy.
The reason that cheaper oil is bad is because the United States’ oil patch is not a low-cost producer, like those of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq are. Blasting apart the earth’s underbelly with pipes and proppants and horizontal rigs is an expensive undertaking. It’s hard to say exactly what the break-even price is for U.S. shale producers, or, perhaps more to the point, where their break-in point is for drilling new holes. It is somewhere between $45 and $60 a barrel. The market is perilously close right now to killing the golden goose.
It’s not just oil, though. U.S. natural gas is not just a big business—it has also been a big export business. Europe, before things escalated, was talking about buying more liquefied natural gas to pacify Trump, and also as a way to wean for good off Russian energy supplies. Japan, South Korea, and even China were big takers of U.S. gas in recent years. South Korea and Japan were two other big targets of Trump’s latest trade salvo.
China, in addition to its 34 percent reprisals, announced a freeze on purchases of U.S. gas. The last time that Beijing did that, during another Trump trade war, it lasted more than a year.
“You don’t want to lose the Asia-Pacific market,” said Anne-Sophie Corbeau, an energy expert at Columbia University’s Center for Global Energy Policy. “Trump wants to sell more U.S. LNG, but he is doing things that move us in the opposite direction.”
Trump’s trade wars may be called off this week, or they may escalate. The fact that nobody knows is precisely part of the problem—and the reason that markets are nervous, investors are skittish, and drillers are hard to get on the phone. Tariffs may or may not restore U.S. industrial dominance, but one thing is for sure: They are doing no favors for the United States’ plans for energy dominance.
The post Trump’s Tariffs Are Killing His Plans for Energy Dominance appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat