November 21

The slow demise of green energy?

0  comments

The wheels are starting to fall off theĀ green energy bandwagon. The rose-colored glasses are clearing up and reality is sinking in.

The giant push toward a net zero utopia is not practical and has been a complete disservice to the American consumer. Components of the green movement are experiencing major setbacks, namely offshore wind, electric vehicles (EVs), and investments.

Offshore wind projects are struggling to secure financing and stay on track. The biggest blow came last month, when the world’s largest offshore wind developer Ørsted canceled two major projectsĀ off the New Jersey coastline, taking the wind right out of Gov. Phil Murphy’s green energy sails. Ƙrsted is also suspending work on offshore projects in Maryland and Delaware.

The industry hit another snag recently when Germany-based Siemens Gamesa Renewable EnergyĀ pulled the plugĀ on its wind turbine blade facility in Portsmouth, Virginia. Siemens Gamesa, one of the world’s leading suppliers, says, ā€œdevelopment milestones to establish the facility could not be met.ā€

According to BloombergNEF, at least half of U.S. wind contracts have or are at risk of being terminated.Ā  The causes are typically due to skyrocketing inflation, high interest rates, choked supply chains and financial troubles.

Offshore wind is costly and difficult to implement.

TheĀ EV market is also losing steam. Sales are slumping and manufacturers are scaling back on production.

Ford Motor Company stands toĀ lose $4.5 billionĀ on its EV business for 2023 and will be delaying many of their EV investments.

General Motors said it wasĀ restructuring EV goals, HondaĀ shelved plansĀ to develop affordable EVs with GM, and Hertz said it willĀ slow their rateĀ of purchasing them due to high repair costs. Elon Musk is even consideringĀ putting off plansĀ for a $1 billion plant in Mexico.

Most, if not all, manufacturers are reporting major losses per EV sold. Ford lostĀ $62,000Ā per vehicle in the third quarter; one luxury electric vehicle company lost an astoundingĀ $430,000. Countless others are losing tens of thousands of dollars per vehicle, quarter after quarter.

Car dealers areĀ slashing EV prices. EVs sit on lots nearlyĀ twice as longĀ as internal combustion engines. EvenĀ industry-leader TeslaĀ has been shaving thousands off their retail prices due to unmet sales expectations.

This kind of loss is not sustainable for any company.

The EV market is niche. Those who want one have one. But the rest of America is not convinced they would be better off with an EV on account of a multitude of reliability factors. Nor can they afford the steep price tag.

Consequently, the last few months have seenĀ stock pricesĀ drastically dropping in companies across the green spectrum. From wind to solar to EVs to fuel cells, investors are abandoning the ā€œgreenā€ energy ship in droves. It might be sinking.

Siemens Energy stock is down 45%; Ƙrsted, 67%; Power Inc., a hydrogen fuel cell producer, 71%; Charge Point Holdings Inc., an EV charging company, 70%; Blink Charging Co., another EV charging company, 72%; and Nikola Corp., maker of heavy-duty EVs, has gone from $65 a share in mid-2020 to the current price of less than $1 per share.

A recent Wall Street JournalĀ articleĀ noted that such companies are ā€œfinding it more difficult to secure financing than at any time in the past decade.ā€

We need to read between the lines here. TheĀ green energy revolutionĀ is not working, nor is central planning. You cannot force Americans to buy cars they don’t want any more than you can force energy transitions that aren’t viable.

Green energy is wholly inadequate to meet the needs of all Americans, and turns out, is insanely expensive.

The World Economic Forum says that getting to net zero by 2050 will cost an extraĀ $3.5 trillionĀ a year. TheĀ U.S. has already pouredĀ hundreds of billions into the effort and continues to keep shoveling. All on the backs of the American taxpayer, to save a mere fraction of temperature. Maybe.

Heritage Foundation’s chief statistician estimates that even if all fossil fuels were eliminated from the United States, not evenĀ 0.2 degreesĀ Celsius would be salvaged.

It’s time to quit throwing other people’s money into these projects and let theĀ market dictate the solutions.

Source: Foxnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top NewsĀ ENBEnergy DashboardENB PodcastENB Substack

Energy News BeatĀ 


Tags


You may also like