The Wolfowitz Plan to Block Russian Natural Gas and Global Geopolitical Realignment has failed
The chief problem of Keitth Kellogg is that he mistook his mission as ending the Ukraine War to save the EU and NATO and mitigate the continual harassment from the mainstream media.
The reality is that the Wolfowitz plan to isolate and break up Russia and Iran as a means of capturing the Persian Gulf and Capsian Sea Petroleum fields and occupying the logistical supply routes has failed.
The Wolfowitz plan shifted the Brzezinski era regime-change destabilization program to a regime-change nation-building program as the means of placing US puppets in charge of the newly formed countries of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan to control the pipeline supply routes to Europe and this project has failed miserably. It merely turned into a continuation of the regime-change destabilization program of Brzezinski instead.
Specifically, Kellogg and his advisors, never realized the difference between the Globalist rhetoric that “Russia is going to use natural gas as a weapon” and that “Russia is pursuing territorial expansion to revive the Soviet Empire” and the actual geostrategic reasons of super powers forming trading blocs to form a superpower-major power-vassal state hierarchy that enables superpowers to become superpowers.
Cover-for-Action Rhetoric in Contradistinction to Sea Power versus Land Power Strategies
In this context, Kellogg didn’t realize that the neoconservatives and neoliberal Gloablists in the financial and military-industrial complex sectors (a) moved the EU and NATO Eastward to extend the Super Power-Major Power-Vassal State hierarchy by including the former Yugoslavian countries and Warsaw Pact countries into new vassal states; (b) to separate Russia from the European Peninsula market place and form a superpower, major power vassal state hierarchy of their own; or (c) did not realize that the Global War on Terror rhetoric was merely the pretext for the West to move into the Middle East to secure both the Petroleum Fields and the pipeline routes to (d) thwart Russian emergence and cooperation against the Sea Powers by building overland logistical supply routes in Eurasia with China.
It is (a-d) that is achieved by (e) the underlying Sea Power Mackinder-Spykman-style Rimland strategy to encircle Russia and China as a whole. In this strategy the Afghanistan nation-building project was supposed to be a gateway into Central Asia to reinstitute the Great Game strategy of the British Empire discussed at length by Peter Hopkirk in his series of books published in the 1990s.
The “Seven Countries in Five Years” objective of the neocons discussed by General Wesley Clark during his 2007 campaign was the strategy to control the entire Middle East into Central Asia and separate Russia and China to thwart and sabotage their overland pipelines, railway, highway and port system. Brzezinski wrote about this in his 1997 book titled The Grand Chessboard.
Economic Development Strategies in Contradistinction to Geopolitical Sabotage Strategies
The Wolfowitz Plan to Block Russian Natural Gas and Global Geopolitical Realignment has failed
The chief problem of Keitth Kellogg is that he mistook his mission as ending the Ukraine War to save the EU and NATO and mitigate the continual harassment from the mainstream media.
The reality is that the Wolfowitz plan to isolate and break up Russia and Iran as a means of capturing the Persian Gulf and Capsian Sea Petroleum fields and occupying the logistical supply routes has failed.
The Wolfowitz plan shifted the Brzezinski era regime-change destabilization program to a regime-change nation-building program as the means of placing US puppets in charge of the newly formed countries of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan to control the pipeline supply routes to Europe and this project has failed miserably. It merely turned into a continuation of the regime-change destabilization program of Brzezinski instead.
Specifically, Kellogg and his advisors, never realized the difference between the Globalist rhetoric that “Russia is going to use natural gas as a weapon” and that “Russia is pursuing territorial expansion to revive the Soviet Empire” and the actual geostrategic reasons of super powers forming trading blocs to form a superpower-major power-vassal state hierarchy that enables superpowers to become superpowers.
Cover-for-Action Rhetoric in Contradistinction to Sea Power versus Land Power Strategies
In this context, Kellogg didn’t realize that the neoconservatives and neoliberal Gloablists in the financial and military-industrial complex sectors (a) moved the EU and NATO Eastward to extend the Super Power-Major Power-Vassal State hierarchy by including the former Yugoslavian countries and Warsaw Pact countries into new vassal states; (b) to separate Russia from the European Peninsula market place and form a superpower, major power vassal state hierarchy of their own; or (c) did not realize that the Global War on Terror rhetoric was merely the pretext for the West to move into the Middle East to secure both the Petroleum Fields and the pipeline routes to (d) thwart Russian emergence and cooperation against the Sea Powers by building overland logistical supply routes in Eurasia with China.
It is (a-d) that is achieved by (e) the underlying Sea Power Mackinder-Spykman-style Rimland strategy to encircle Russia and China as a whole. In this strategy the Afghanistan nation-building project was supposed to be a gateway into Central Asia to reinstitute the Great Game strategy of the British Empire discussed at length by Peter Hopkirk in his series of books published in the 1990s.
The “Seven Countries in Five Years” objective of the neocons discussed by General Wesley Clark during his 2007 campaign was the strategy to control the entire Middle East into Central Asia and separate Russia and China to thwart and sabotage their overland pipelines, railway, highway and port system. Brzezinski wrote about this in his 1997 book titled The Grand Chessboard.
Economic Development Strategies in Contradistinction to Geopolitical Sabotage Strategies
knows nothing about it so the Western electorate, and even the Western military leaders, stays in the dark as well.
Instead of receiving any real news based on any real understanding of the Sea Power versus Land Power strategies, the journalists and the American public are fed a fake news diet crafted by the Wall Street and City of London financial class in one sense, which is amplified into mass conformity perfection by the chorus of USAID and the NED funded Operation Mockingbird alternative media Youtube channels who unwittingly broadcast even more fake news. The Western mainstream and Mockingbird alternative media outlets are a massive misinformation perpetual feedback loop.
The Fake News Cover for Action
The fake news such as “Russia invaded for no reason,” “Russia is going to invade Central Europe,” and Ukraine is winning the War” are trumpeted in the mainstream and Mockingbird alternative media outlets that obscure the underlying foreign policy of the US. This has occurred to such an extent that LTG Kellogg was massively misinformed as well.
The actual concern of the Brzezinski-Wolfowitz strategy was always to contain Russia and China. Professor John Lewis Gaddis has written several books on this topic and the Russians and Chinese have read them too. This is why the Russians, Chinese, and Iran have coordinated their overland logistical supply route counterstrategies to bolster each other economic development and political stability.
Putin and the “Do Nothing” Approach to Western Delusion
The Russian, Chinese, and Iranian counter strategy now has the effect of creating the very Eurasian integration economic and military blocs that the Brzezinski-Wolfowitz strategy was designed to stop. Now, all Putin has to do to realize the Ratzel, Haushofer, and Dugin Eurasian land power dream is simply “do nothing” and let the energy prices soar across Europe.
If the populist parties win in the Danube River Valley countries and rebuild Nordstream to buy Russian natural gas in Rubles to save their economies and societies, then they will have to abandon the petrodollar, the EU, and NATO that are enforcing the sanctions.
On the other hand, if the WEF globalist-backed politicians increase their lawfare and mass censorship of their rivals to win the upcoming 2025 elections, and stick to the Green New Deal net zero delusion, then all Putin has to do is to sit back and watch the deindustrialization policies to run their course and lead the West into a series of cascading bankruptcies that cannot fund their generous welfare states.
Putin and Xi will be fine with either outcome and all Putin has to do is nothing. The Kellogg Plan to deal with Putin from a position of strength was dead on arrival since it was first published back in April of 2024.
Let’s hope the elections in Central Europe are too big to rig and President Trump and Elon Musk go all in and support the populist movements across the UK and Europe. The 2026 midterms will arrive faster than anyone thinks and overcoming the mainstream media mendacity will be the biggest obstacle to overcome.
Part 3: Understanding the Catastrophic Downside Risk of the Kellogg Plan and Exploring Alternatives
Part 2: Why Keith Kellogg’s Plan is DOA: Shifting the Global Political Center of Gravity Part 2
George McMillan Articles and Interviews: https://energynewsbeat.co/george-mcmillian/
Energy News Beat